George A. Albert v. Hon. John H. Chafee, Secretary of the Navy
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Per curiam
Appellant filed a complaint in the district court challenging the lawfulness of his dismissal as a civilian employee of the Department of the Navy.
The defendants moved to dismiss. The district court entered an order purporting to grant summary judgment for the defendants. The government argues, however, and we agree, that the district court’s intention was to dismiss the action for lack of, jurisdiction.
We have repeatedly reviewed the merits of agency action discharging government employees, necessarily assuming that both district courts and this court had jurisdiction to do so. See Toohey v.…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Abbott Laboratories v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Charlton v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1969
- John J. Toohey v. Paul H. Nitze, Secretary, U. S. Department of the NavyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1970
- Herak v. KellyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1968
3Cited by9 opinions
- Diamond Ring Ranch, Inc. v. MortonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1976
- Burton v. United States Olympic CommitteeDistrict Court, C.D. California · 1983
- Albert v. ChafeeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
- Doris G. Francisco v. Alan K. Campbell, Chairman, Jule M. Sugarman, Vice Chairman, and Ersa H. Poston, Member, United States Civil Service CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
- Michael J. Cafferello v. United States Civil Service Commission, Secretary of the NavyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.