Legal Opinion

Mullen v. Mohican Co.

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided December 5, 1921PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBeach, J.

The material facts testified to are as follows: Munroe Court in Waterbury runs easterly between brick buildings from North Main Street. It is about nine and a half feet wide, paved with asphalt, and has a curb and sidewalk two feet wide on the north side of a portion of its length. On the southerly side of the court is the side wall of the brick building occupied by the defendant corporation. Near the rear of the building defendant maintained an elevator shaft opening on Munroe Court through a doorway, which was ordinarily closed when the elevator was not in use by a vertically sliding iron…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Wiwirowski v. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1891
  2. Wilmot v. McPaddenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1906
  3. Morris v. Town of East HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1874
  4. Chase v. Maine Central RailroadSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1885
  5. Smith v. Town of MilfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1914

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Kotler v. LalleySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1930
  2. Burke v. Town of West HartfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1960
  3. Jacen v. Town of East HartfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1946
  4. Simauskas v. Connecticut Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1925
  5. Plona v. Connecticut Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1924

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API