Legal Opinion
Simauskas v. Connecticut Co.
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided February 5, 1925PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBeach, J.
The trial court set aside the verdict on the ground that there was no testimony from which the jury could reasonably have found that the plaintiff’s injuries were proximately caused by the defendant’s negligence.
The plaintiff was a boy five years old, and his injuries were caused by contact with a moving trolley-car operated by defendant’s servants. The accident occurred at the intersection of Riverside Street and Bank Street in the city of Waterbury. At that place Bank Street runs nearly east and west, and passes under the tracks of the New York, New Haven and Hartford Railroad Company, a…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Fay v. Hartford & Springfield Street Railway Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1908
- Mullen v. Mohican Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1921
- Plona v. Connecticut Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1924
- Kruck v. Connecticut Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1911
- Mesite v. Connecticut Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1909
3Cited by11 opinions
- Burke v. Town of West HartfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1960
- Genishevsky v. FishboneSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1929
- Hebert v. LenartMississippi Supreme Court · 1963
- Tracy v. WelchSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1929
- Oddwycz v. Connecticut Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1928
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.