Alejandro v. ST Micro Electronics, Inc.
District Court, N.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
Re: Dkt. No. 44-4
LUCY H. KOH, United States District Judge
Defendant STMicroelectronics, Inc. has filed a motion for summary judgment on all of Plaintiff Jesse Alejandro’s claims. ECF No. 44-4 (“Mot.”). Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-l(b), the Court finds this matter appropriate for resolution without oral argument and VACATES the motion hearing and case management conference set for April 14, 2016. Having considered the parties’ submissions, the relevant law, and the record in this case, the Court GRANTS Defendant’s motion.
I. BACKGROUND
A. Factual…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- House v. BellSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Soremekun v. Thrifty Payless, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- Carolyn Humphrey v. Memorial Hospitals AssociationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Appin v. Mergermarket (U.S.) Ltd.District Court, N.D. California · 2025
- Estrada v. KAG West, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2025
- Stewart v. RossDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2020
- Tandon v. GN Audio USA, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2021