Legal Opinion

William Henry Thomas, III v. State of Florida

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided April 28, 2016No. 1D14-5544PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

■ This appeal is brought under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Upon review of the record, we find no preserved error warranting reversal. We affirm Appellant’s judgment and sentence.

However, a review of the record reveals a possible sentencing error concerning the court’s assessment of $100 in sheriffs investigative costs imposed pursuant to section 938.27, Florida Statutes (2010), as the court did not orally pronounce the discretionary cost at the sentencing hearing. Mills v. State, 177 So.3d 984, 988 (Fla. 1st DCA 2015) (holding that the trial court…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Mills v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2015
  3. Kirkland v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2013
  4. Collando-Pena v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2014
  5. Everly Scott Lippwe v. State of FloridaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2014

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. R.L.F. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2017
  2. R.L.F. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API