Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Uskali v. Snodgrass

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided June 10, 1975No. 9473PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOGAN, Judge.

This is an original proceeding in prohibition. Our preliminary writ issued and the cause is now taken on the record made in this court as provided by Rule 84.24, V.A. M.R.,1 and the briefs filed by the parties.

On July 21, 1959, relators and Frank and Doral Parish entered into an agreement to develop and sell a parcel of land located in Camden County, Missouri. As immediately material, the contract provides that in consideration of the discharge of a mortgage, a payment in cash and an undertaking to *889bear the cost of development, Frank and Doral Parish shall “develop” the land…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Boll v. WeinsteinSupreme Court of Missouri · 1956
  2. State Ex Rel. Schoenbacher v. KellyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1966
  3. Marston v. CatterlinSupreme Court of Missouri · 1921
  4. State ex rel. State Highway Commission v. ElliottSupreme Court of Missouri · 1959
  5. Knisley v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1970

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Speer v. GrimmMissouri Court of Appeals · 1980
  2. Mercantile Trust Co. National Ass'n v. AndersonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1981
  3. State ex rel. Cobb v. RussellSupreme Court of Missouri · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API