Legal Opinion

G. Gennert (Inc.) v. United States

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided April 10, 1930No. 3261Published

1Opinion of the CourtHatfield, Judge

This is an appeal from the judgment of the United States Customs Court in Reappraisements 14337-A, etc.

The imported merchandise is a coal-tar product, known as “methyl-paramidophenol and monomethylparamidophenolsulfat, metol.” It *13is admitted by .counsel for the parties that the merchandise is dutiable under paragraph 28 of the Tariff Act of 1922, and subject to the provisions thereof; that it is competitive with a coal-tar product produced in the United States, “rhodol,” and is dutiable at a value based upon the American selling price of that article as defined in section 402 (f).

The…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. United States v. RichardCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1927
  2. United States v. International Forwarding Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1926
  3. United States v. Fragele Bros.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1924
  4. United States v. WakemCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1926
  5. Gallagher v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1913

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API