Legal Opinion

United States v. Wakem

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided May 29, 1926No. 2673PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGraham, Presiding Judge

The importers entered seven shipments of radial ball bearings at the port of Chicago. In entry No. 4078, the Government having *162received information leading the collector to believe the goods were appraised at too low a figure, appealed to reappraisement. After a hearing, the single general appraiser found the dutiable value of these goods to be “invoice value multiplied by eighteen one-hundredths. Less 33Less 10 and 7J4 per cent. Add packing.” From this judgment, importer applied for a review by the Board of General Appraisers. In the six remaining entries the goods were appraised in…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States v. International Forwarding Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1926
  2. Sandoz Chemical Works v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1926
  3. Kuttroff v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1925
  4. Metz & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1926

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. G. Gennert (Inc.) v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1930
  2. Thornley v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1931
  3. United States v. GalefCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1930
  4. United States v. MalhameCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API