Legal Opinion

Hodges v. Stone Savannah River Pulp and Paper Corp.

District Court, S.D. Georgia

Decided April 11, 1995No. Civ. A. 494-124PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

EDENFIELD, Chief Judge.

Before the Court is Defendant Stone Savannah River Pulp and Paper Corporation’s (“Stone”) motion for summary judgment. As there are no genuine issues of material fact and Stone is due judgment as a matter of law, the Court GRANTS Stone’s motion.

I. BACKGROUND

The Court takes sexual discrimination cases seriously. This, however, is not a sexual discrimination case. Instead this case is about Plaintiff Barbara Hodges’ frustration at not being able to secure the job she desired. Trained as an electrician, quite understandably, Hodges wanted to work in her field.…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  5. Mt. Healthy City School District Board of Education v. DoyleSupreme Court of the United States · 1977

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Demuren v. Old Dominion UniversityDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1999
  2. Shuford v. Alabama State Board of EducationDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 1997
  3. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Union Camp Corp.District Court, S.D. Georgia · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API