Legal Opinion

Robert Darrell Yeargain v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided March 11, 1963No. 18186PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Per curiam

Appellant appeals from a conviction by the trial court of two counts of violating Section 472 1 of Title 18 United States Code, uttering counterfeit money. It is undisputed that the money passed in each instance was counterfeit. While some question of identification of the appellant as the “passer” was made below, that point, decided adversely to appellant, is not raised on appeal.

The primary question raised is this:

Is the fact appellant testified he ’“washed” a counterfeit $20 bill (a statement proved false by expert testimony, if the expert was believed) sufficient to permit the jury to…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  2. Wong Tai v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  3. Henry Rodella v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1960
  4. Remmer v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1953
  5. United States v. CasertaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1952

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. United States v. Frank Stearns GieseCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
  2. United States v. Francis B. KendallCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1981
  3. Gene Downing v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1965
  4. United States v. Burdette George WinnCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
  5. United States v. Climatemp, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1979

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API