Legal Opinion

People ex rel. Sochet v. Sochet

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided March 7, 1921No. 9993PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Action on ne exeat bond. Demurrer to complaint sustained and action dismissed. On Application for Supersedeas. Error to the District Court of the City and County of Denver, Hon. Henry J. Hersey, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Allen

This is an action upon a ne exeat bond, and is brought against both the principal and the surety. To the second amended complaint the defendant surety filed a demurrer upon the ground that the complaint “does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action against this defendant.” The demurrer was sustained, and plaintiff electing to stand on the complaint,- judgment was entered for the defendant surety. The plaintiff brings error, and the cause is before us upon an application for a supersedeas.

Error is assigned to the sustaining of the demurrer, and, according to the briefs, the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Haney v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1888
  2. Plummer v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court · 1855
  3. Huggins v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court · 1866

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Van Gilder v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1924
  2. People ex rel. Sochet v. SochetSupreme Court of Colorado · 1923
  3. Alexander Thomson, Inc. v. B. Perini & Sons, Inc.Connecticut Superior Court · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API