Legal Opinion

Nasreen v. Capital Petroleum Group, LLC

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided November 15, 2021No. Civil Action No. 2020-1867Published

1Opinion of the Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA KHONDKER NASREEN, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 20-1867 (TJK) CAPITOL PETROLEUM GROUP, LLC et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION Plaintiff Khondker Nasreen’s counsel moves to withdraw as counsel for Nasreen, and Nasreen has moved to stay discovery until her counsel’s motion to withdraw is resolved. Defend- ants Capitol Petroleum Group, LLC and Anacostia Realty, LLC oppose both motions. Because the relevant factors weigh in favor of granting the motion to withdraw and because the Court will modify the scheduling order on its own…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Partridge v. Am. Hosp. Mgmt. Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2017
  2. Beale v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2008
  3. Honda Power Equipment Manufacturing, Inc. v. WoodhouseDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2003
  4. Byrd v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2003
  5. Sabre International Security v. Torres Advanced Enterprise Solutions, LLCDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API