Legal Opinion
Techtronic Cordless GP v. Maersk A/S
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided February 23, 2023No. 1:22-cv-09513Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK TECHTRONIC CORDLESS GP, Plaintiff, -v- CIVIL ACTION NO.: 22 Civ. 9513 (GHW) (SLC) OPINION & ORDER MAERSK A/S, VC N PRIORITY SHIPPING GMBH & CO. KG, and M/V NORTHERN PRIORITY, IN REM, Defendants. SARAH L. CAVE, United States Magistrate Judge. I. BACKGROUND On November 7, 2022, Plaintiff Techtronic Cordless GP (“Techtronic”) filed the complaint in this action. (See ECF No. 1 (the “Complaint”)). On February 7, 2023, noting Techtronic’s failure to file proof of service of the Summons and Complaint as to Defendants Maersk A/S (“Maersk”),…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- DeLuca v. AccessIT Group, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2010
- Zapata v. City of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2007
- Vaher v. Town of OrangetownDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2013
- Jordan v. Forfeiture Support AssociatesDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2013
- Corley v. VanceDistrict Court, S.D. Illinois · 2019
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.