Legal Opinion
Pacific Mut. Life Ins. Co. of California v. Rotondo
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided March 16, 1951No. Civ. A. No. 11678PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEANEY, District Judge.
This is an action of interpleader submitted to the court upon a stipulation of agreed facts to determine who is entitled to the proceeds of a policy of insurance upon the life of one Louis W. Greenwood.
The policy was executed in California, and at that time the insured was a resident of California. The original named beneficiary was May A. Greenwood, mother of the insured. In 1946, by endorsement, the beneficiary was changed to make the proceeds payable as follows: One-fourth to Dorothy May Groscup (now Dorothy May Groscup Rotondo), one-fourth to Ada May Greenwood, and…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Cook v. CookCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Pimentel v. Conselho Supremo de Uniao Portugueza do Estado da CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
- Wood & Selick, Inc. v. American Grocery Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1921
- Lloyd v. Massachusetts Accident Co.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1939
3Cited by5 opinions
- Connecticut General Life Insurance Co. v. HartshornCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1956
- Connecticut General Life Insurance v. HartshornCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1956
- Alleen S. Mildren, and Donald Lee Mildren v. Jessie MildrenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1956
- Pacific Mutual Life Insurance Company of California v. Dorothy May Groscup Rotondo, Ada May Greenwood, and Genevieve A. GreenwoodCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1951
- Pacific Mutual Life Insurance v. RotondoCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1951