Toney v. Burgess
Court of Appeals of Arkansas
1Opinion of the CourtRaymond R. Abramson, Judge
Appellant Tabatha Burgess, now known as Tabatha Toney (Toney), appeals the circuit court's reformation of a decree reflecting a mutual mistake. Toney argues that (1) the circuit court admitted evidence in violation of the parol-evidence rule, (2) the circuit court was without jurisdiction to modify the decree pursuant to Arkansas Rule of Civil Procedure 60, and (3) the circuit court's reformation of the decree was clearly erroneous because there was no evidence to support a finding of mutual mistake. We disagree and affirm.
I. Factual and Procedural History
Toney filed a complaint for absolute…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Statler v. PainterCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2003
- Lawrence v. BarnesCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2010
- Mauldin v. SnowdenCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2011
- Stalter v. GibsonCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2010
- Walt Bennett Ford, Inc. v. DyerCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1982
3Cited by2 opinions
- Julius Williams v. Carson Bridges, Jr.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 2026
- Treloggen v. TreloggenCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2018