Legal Opinion
Flores v. LANGSAM PROPERTY SERVICES CORP.
New York Court of Appeals
Decided October 20, 2009PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs.
Plaintiff failed to raise a triable issue of fact regarding defendants’ actual or constructive notice of the particular dangerous condition that allegedly caused her injuries (see Gordon v American Museum of Natural History, 67 NY2d 836, 838 [1986]).
Chief Judge Lippman and Judges Ciparick, Graffeo, Read, Smith, Pigott and Jones concur.
On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.11), order affirmed, with costs, in a memorandum.
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Gordon v. American Museum of Natural HistoryNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
3Cited by5 opinions
- Transitional Services of New York for Long Island, Inc. v. New York State Office of Mental HealthDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2015
- Floyd v. 1710 Realty, LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
- McIntyre v. Bradford White Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2023
- Frassinelli v. 120 East 73rd Street Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
- Gonzalez v. American Steel Processing Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010