Legal Opinion

In re Various Property Owners to Benefit Assessments for Widening Mulberry Street

New Jersey Circuit Court

Decided April 19, 1933PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Mountain, C. C. J.

The matter under consideration is the appeal by nineteen property owners of land along Mulberry street in the city of Newark from an assessment for benefits made by the commissioners of assessments for widening the said street. They found no incidental damages.

Some of these property owners have been compensated iu another proceeding for land taken and damage to remaining land.

We are informed that seventy-five per cent, of the benefit has been placed on the city at large and twenty-five per cent, on the property holders. With the exception of Boudinot street, assessments…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. Hudson County Board of Chosen FreeholdersSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1892
  2. Davis v. City of NewarkSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1891
  3. Davis v. Mayor of NewarkSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1892
  4. State v. Mayor of BayonneSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1897
  5. State v. Mayor of North PlainfieldSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1899

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. McNALLYS. v. Tp. of TeaneckNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1975
  2. Louisville Memorial Gardens, Inc. v. CarpenterCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1953
  3. In re Appeal of Various Property Owners to Benefit Assessments for Local Improvements for the Opening of Raymond Plaza WestNew Jersey Circuit Court · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API