Legal Opinion

Smith v. Wall

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 19, 1929No. Docket No. 6469PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHouser, J.

This is a motion to dismiss an appeal from a judgment rendered by the superior court, on the ground that the transcript of the record was not filed within the time prescribed “by law.”

By section 1 of Rule I of the rules of the supreme court and the district courts of appeal it is provided that, in a civil action, within forty days after an appeal is perfected the appellant must “serve and file the printed transcript of the record. ...” If “not filed within the time prescribed, the appeal may be dismissed, ...” (See. 1, Rule V.)

Prom the affidavit presented in support of the motion herein it…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Griffin v. KentCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
  2. Attkisson v. ReynoldsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Sterling Corporation v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
  2. Benson v. GardnerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
  3. Best v. SmithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
  4. Rinaldo v. Board of Medical ExaminersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
  5. Ertman v. BlumenthalAppellate Division of the Superior Court of California · 1945

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API