Legal Opinion

Rinaldo v. Board of Medical Examiners

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 27, 1932No. Docket No. 7416PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtHouser, J.

It appears that the pertinent facts upon which the’ appeal herein is based are that the respondent gave its notice of appeal from a certain judgment in the court below; that thereupon, by order of the trial court, an extension of time was granted to the respondent within which to file its bill of exceptions in said appeal, which extension was one day in excess of the statutory time limit in such cases made and provided. Following the date of such order of extension, and on the last day thereof, the respondent did serve upon this appellant and file with the clerk of said court its bill of…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Davilla v. Liberty Life InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
  2. Griffin v. KentCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
  3. Sterling Corporation v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
  4. Attkisson v. ReynoldsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
  5. Smith v. WallCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Rinaldo v. Board of Medical ExaminersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API