Legal Opinion

Application of Arthur R. Tomlinson, Harry H. Hall and William F. Geigle

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided August 4, 1966No. Patent Appeal 7500Published

1Opinion of the Court

363 F.2d 928

Application of Arthur R. TOMLINSON, Harry H. Hall and William F. Geigle.

Patent Appeal No. 7500.

United States Court of Customs and Patent Appeals.

August 4, 1966.

Charles E. Feeny, Philadelphia, Pa., Dos T. Hatfield, Washington, D. C., for appellants.

Clarence W. Moore, Washington, D. C. (J. F. Nakamura, Washington, D. C., of counsel), for the Commissioner of Patents.

Before WORLEY, Chief Judge, and RICH, MARTIN, SMITH, and ALMOND, Judges.

RICH, Judge.

1

This appeal is from the decision of the Patent Office Board of Appeals1 affirming the examiner's rejection of product claims 1 through…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Application of McKennaCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1953
  2. Application of Arthur R. Tomlinson, Harry H. Hall and William F. GeigleCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1966
  3. Application of Douglas H. MoretonCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1961
  4. Application of Wilhelm Neugebauer, Martha Tomanek and Hans BehmenburgCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1964
  5. In re LunsfordCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API