United States v. Jomes Howard Borth
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
PICKETT, Circuit Judge.
The United States brought this action to recover damages and the $2,000 statutory forfeiture provided for under the False Claims Act, 31 U.S.C.A. § 231. 1 The trial court entered a summary judgment in favor of the defendant. The determinative question presented is whether a false statement of an honorably discharged veteran of the armed services of the United States, made for the purpose of obtaining admission and free medical treatment in a Veterans’ Administration hospital, creates a liability under the aforesaid statute. We agree with the trial court that it does…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Prigg v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1842
- United States v. McNinchSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- United States v. CohnSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
- United States v. Martin TiegerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1956
- United States v. St. Paul Mercury Indemnity Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1956
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- United States v. Stanley N. Howell, Warren S. Cochran, Cochran & Howell, a Partnership, Post Cleaners, Thrifty CleanersCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1963
- Heddin v. Delhi Gas Pipeline CompanyTexas Supreme Court · 1975
- Don Fleming, D/B/A Green Valley Feed Mill v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1964
- Aaron Sell v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1964
- Drearr v. Connecticut General Life Insurance Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1960
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.