Legal Opinion
State v. Kelsaw
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided October 27, 1972No. C 72-02-0484 Cr; C 72-02-0485 CrPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSchwab, C.J.
The defendant was twice convicted, on separate indictments, of the sale of heroin. His appeal from each conviction has been consolidated for argument before this court. The issues on appeal relate to Oregon’s notice of alibi statute, OBS 135.875, which reads:
“ (1) If the defendant in a criminal action proposes to rely in any way on alibi evidence, he shall, not less than five days before the trial of the cause, file and serve upon the district attorney a written notice of his purpose to offer such evidence, which notice shall state specifically the place or places where the defendant claims…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Williams v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Wardius v. OregonSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- State v. PaceOregon Supreme Court · 1949
- State v. OvittSupreme Court of Vermont · 1967
- State v. GoddardOregon Supreme Court · 1913
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Wardius v. OregonSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- State v. MoralesOregon Supreme Court · 1973
- State v. KelsawCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1973
- State v. KnightenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1972
- Wardius v. OregonSupreme Court of the United States · 1973