People v. Skinner
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Murray Mogel, J.), entered on or *351about March 22, 1994, which granted defendant’s motion to suppress identification testimony, unanimously affirmed.
While the police are permitted to rely on the direction of their fellow officers to make an arrest, they cannot be considered to have relied on information possessed by each other without the guidance of any communication of either the information itself or a direction to arrest having been imparted and received (People v Mitchell, 185 AD2d 163, 164, appeal dismissed 81 NY2d 819). Here, the testimony at the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- People v. DodtNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
- People v. MitchellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
3Cited by7 opinions
- People v. PowellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- People v. MosesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- People v. ThomasAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- People v. MosesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- People v. PowellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.