Legal Opinion

(PC) Witkin v. Lotersztain

District Court, E.D. California

Decided March 31, 2023No. 2:19-cv-00406Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 MICHAEL WITKIN, No. 2:19-cv-0406 TLN KJN P 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. 14 MARIANA LOTERSZTAIN, et al., FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS 15 Defendants. 16 17 I. Introduction 18 Plaintiff is a former state prisoner, proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, with a civil 19 rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The motion for summary judgment filed by defendants 20 Lotersztain, Scott, Largoza, Kuersten, and Gates is before the court. As set forth below, it is 21 recommended that defendants’ motion be granted in part and…

2Cases cited43 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. Farmer v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1994

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API