Legal Opinion
Darling v. Pinkham
Massachusetts Appeals Court
Decided April 1, 1980PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The plaintiff was appointed conservatrix by a Connecticut court. She brought a petition for partition of the ward’s real estate in the Probate *886Court for Barnstable County. The ward was a joint tenant of the real estate with the defendant. The court entered an “interlocutory decree” ordering partition from which the defendant appeals. G. L. c. 241, § 10. Asker v. Asker, 8 Mass. App. Ct. 634, 635 (1979).
Harry Sarkis Terkanian for the defendant. William A. Doherty, Jr., for the plaintiff.
1. The plaintiff as conservatrix had standing to bring an action for partition. There is no merit to the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Royal Indemnity Co. v. BlakelyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1977
- Minnehan v. MinnehanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1958
- Asker v. AskerMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1979
- Mede v. ColbertMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1961
3Cited by3 opinions
- Palmer v. MurphyMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1997
- Gershaw v. GershfieldMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2001
- Commissioner of Revenue v. BobackMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1981