Legal Opinion
In re Guillen
United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Georgia
Decided April 10, 2017No. CASE NO. 15-64860-JRSPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER APPROVING MODIFICATION OF CONFIRMED CHAPTER 13 PLAN
James R. Sacca, U.S. Bankruptcy Court Judge
The issue before the Court is whether it should approve a proposed modification of a confirmed chapter 13 plan to decrease the pool to unsecured creditors by the amount of the attorney’s fees incurred to create the basis for the pool, or whether it should deny the modification because the amount of the pool in the confirmed plan is res judicata or the decrease in the amount of the pool violates the best interests of creditors test.
The Debtor filed for Chapter 13 on August 4, 2015. Her spouse is…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Astoria Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. SoliminoSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Isbrandtsen Co. v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- In the Matter of Ronald J. Witkowski, Debtor-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
- In the Matter of Russell E. Sinclair, Sr. And M. Marguerite Sinclair, Debtors-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1989
- In Re Francis A. Arnold, A/K/A Frank Arnold, Debtor. Francis A. Arnold, A/K/A Frank Arnold v. Ruth WeastCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1989
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- In re DamronUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Georgia · 2019
- In re MatusakUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. North Carolina · 2017