United States v. International Forwarding Co.
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
■ Appeal from Board of United States General Appraisers, Abstract 41875. [Oral argument Apr. 20,1918, by Mr. Hanson and Mr. Washburn.]
1Opinion of the Court
Martin) Judge,
delivered tbe opinion of the court.
The merchandise now upon appeal is described by the appraiser as “millinery ornaments composed of straw”; it was assessed with duty at the rate of 60 per cent ad valorem under the provision for “ artificial and ornamental fruits, grains, leaves, flowers, and stems or parts thereof, of whatever 'material composed, not specially provided for,” contained in paragraph 347 of the tariff act of 1913.
The importers protested against the assessment, claiming an assessment of 25 per cent ad valorem under the provisions of paragraph 368 for manufactures…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- United States v. Gage Bros.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1918
3Cited by5 opinions
- Cochran Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1920
- Isler & Guye v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1920
- Johnson & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1920
- Louis Weinberg Associates, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1952
- Bronston Bros. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1933