Legal Opinion
Scofield v. Telecable of Overland Park, Inc.
District Court, D. Kansas
Decided November 13, 1990No. Civ. A. 89-4014-S, 89-4015-SPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
SAFFELS, District Judge.
This matter is before the court on the parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment in both of the above-captioned companion cases. Because case no. 89-4014-S and case no. 89-4015-S involve the same fundamental questions of fact and law, and seek the same relief, these cases will be consolidated for purposes of considering the parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment. Fed.R.Civ.P. 42(a); Ringwald v. Harris, 675 F.2d 768, 770-71 (5th Cir.1982); Wilson v. Watson, 309 F.Supp. 263, 268 (D.Kan.1968).
In these actions, this court is once again asked to…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Wilson v. GarciaSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Simon v. Eastern Kentucky Welfare Rights OrganizationSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Connally v. General Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Kenro, Inc. v. Fax Daily, Inc.District Court, S.D. Indiana · 1997
- Scofield v. Telecable of Overland Park, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1992
- Reid Scofield, Cross-Appellee v. Telecable of Overland Park, Inc., Cross-Appellant, National Cable Television Association, Inc. G. Ray Warner, Professor, Amici Curiae. Debbie D. Anderson, Cross-Appellee v. Telecable of Overland Park, Inc., Cross-Appellant, National Cable Television Association, Inc. G. Ray Warner, Professor, Amici CuriaeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1992
- Throneburg v. Charter Communications, Inc.District Court, E.D. Missouri · 2019