Weiland Sliding Doors & Windows, Inc. v. Panda Windows & Doors, LLC
District Court, S.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER (1) DENYING WEILAND’S SPECIAL MOTION TO DISMISS AND (2) GRANTING WEILAND’S RULE 12(b)(6) MOTION TO DISMISS
JANIS L. SAMMARTINO, District Judge.
This action began on March 30, 2010, when Weiland Sliding Doors and Windows, Inc. filed a patent infringement suit against Panda Windows and Doors, LLC. Panda soon struck back with a counterclaim for intentional interference with prospective business advantage. (Amended Counterclaim, ECF No. 59.)
Panda’s counterclaim is based on three sets of communications. First is a communication between Weiland and a company called Kolbe. The communication took…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Papasan v. AllainSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- John Desoto v. Yellow Freight Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- Vess v. Ciba-Geigy Corp. USACourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Fielder v. Sterling Park Homeowners Ass'nDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2012
- E.D.C. Technologies, Inc. v. SeidelDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2016
- Apex.AI, Inc. v. LangmeadDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2024
- Hicks v. Grimmway Enterprises, Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 2023
- Moonbug Entertainment Limited v. Babybus (Fujian) Network Technology Co., LtdDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2022
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.