Legal Opinion

Kendler v. Wirtz

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided January 18, 1968No. 16340PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

HASTIE, Chief Judge.

The plaintiffs in this action, appellants here, are seven employees of the Pennsylvania Railroad and the local of the Brotherhood of Trainmen to which they belong. They sued in a district court to enjoin the Secretary of Labor from certifying that “fair and equitable arrangements”, within the meaning of section 10(c) of the Urban Mass Transportation Act of 1964, 49 U.S.C. § 1609 (c), have been made to protect the interests of railroad employees, as they may be affected by three proposed federal grants-in-aid to the State of New Jersey and certain state…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Wong Yang Sung v. McGrathSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
  2. United States v. CarmackSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  3. Swayne & Hoyt, Ltd. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
  4. Panama Canal Co. v. Grace Line, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1958
  5. United States v. George S. Bush & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Zannino v. ArnoldCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1976
  2. Ray Baillie Trash Hauling, Inc. v. Thomas S. Kleppe, Administrator, Small Business AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1973
  3. Local Division 589, Amalgamated Transit Union, Afl-Cio, Clc v. The Commonwealth of Massachusetts, Local Division 589, Amalgamated Transit Union, Afl-Cio v. The Commonwealth of Massachusetts, Local Division 589, Amalgamated Transit Union, Afl-Cio v. The Commonwealth of Massachusetts, Massachusetts Bay Transportation AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1981
  4. Local 2855, AFGE (AFL-CIO) v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1979
  5. Amalgamated Transit Union International, Afl-Cio v. Raymond J. Donovan, Secretary of LaborCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1985

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API