Legal Opinion

Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Co. v. Smith

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided December 16, 1981No. 5506PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BROWN, Justice.

Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Company (Panhandle) appeals a district court judgment granting damages to its former employee Nowlin Smith, Jr., for breach of contract. Panhandle asserts that no contract ever existed. It maintains that the dispute which is here on appeal should have been submitted to arbitration under the terms of a collective bargaining agreement. It also maintains that if this court decides a contract did exist, we should nevertheless reverse the damage award because it was not supported by sufficient evidence.

We affirm.

Panhandle fired Mr. Smith in October, 1979.…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. United Steelworkers v. Warrior & Gulf Navigation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
  2. Vaca v. SipesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Story Parchment Co. v. Paterson Parchment Paper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
  4. Palmer v. Connecticut Railway & Lighting Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
  5. Madrid v. NortonWyoming Supreme Court · 1979

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. Sterling Drug, Inc. v. OxfordSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1988
  2. McCullough v. Golden Rule Insurance Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Myron Durtsche, Jr. v. American Colloid CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1992
  4. Moncrief v. Louisiana Land & Exploration Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1993
  5. JBC of Wyoming Corp. v. City of CheyenneWyoming Supreme Court · 1992

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API