State v. Loupe
Louisiana Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
PONDER, Judge.
This application for review was remanded to us “for reconsideration by a panel of three judges, particularly on the issue of probable cause,” citing City of Baton Rouge v. Mitchell, 325 So.2d 588 (La.1976).
We have considered and adhere to our prior decision that there was no error.
Defendant, charged with driving while intoxicated, filed a motion to suppress all evidence against him. When the motion was denied he entered a plea of nolo con-tendere reserving his right to contest the ruling on his motion to suppress.
Defendant was involved in an accident without fault on his part.…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- State v. MontgomeryLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1983
- State v. PattersonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1983
- State v. TannerLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1983
- City of Baton Rouge v. MitchellSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1976
3Cited by2 opinions
- State v. LoupeSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1983
- State v. LoupeSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1983