Legal Opinion

Kieckhefer v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided November 6, 1933No. M-50PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

LITTLETON, Judge.

In this ease plaintiffs, as liquidators of the Kieekhefer Paper Company, dissolved, seek to recover overpayments of income and profits tax duly allowed by the Commission.er of Internal Revenue in the amount of $14,-710.90 for 1918 and $1,401.38 for 1920, with interest. These overpayments were applied as credits against an additional assessment of $26,036.56 against the dissolved corporation for 1919. The deficiency for 1919 was assessed against the corporation during January, 1926, more than five years after the return for 1919 was due and was filed.

The defendant contends…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Leisenring v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1933
  2. A. J. Bates Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1933
  3. Bonwit Teller & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1931

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Walder v. Paramount Publix CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API