Legal Opinion

Alan v. Andrews, 06 Ma 151 (5-22-2007)

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided May 22, 2007No. 06 MA 151PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

{¶ 1} This timely appeal comes for consideration upon the record in the trial court, the parties' briefs, and their oral arguments before this court. Defendants-Appellants, Andbloom, LLC, and Fred Andrews, appeal the decision of the Mahoning County Court of Common Pleas that awarded Plaintiff-Appellee, the B.J. Alan Company, with an injunction preventing Appellants from violating the terms of Andrews's agreement not to compete with B.J. Alan after his resignation for one year within a defined geographic area. Appellants challenge this conclusion for many reasons, arguing that the…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Blakemore v. BlakemoreOhio Supreme Court · 1983
  2. In re Jane Doe 1Ohio Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Raimonde v. Van VlerahOhio Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Procter Gamble Company v. StonehamOhio Court of Appeals · 2000
  5. Lake Land Employment Group of Akron, LLC v. ColumberOhio Supreme Court · 2004

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. B.J. Alan Co. v. AndrewsOhio Court of Appeals · 2014
  2. All Foils, Inc. v. KulikOhio Court of Appeals · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API