Keilholz v. Chicago & North Western Railway Co.
Appellate Court of Illinois
1Dissent
Mr. PRESIDING JUSTICE STAMOS
dissenting:
Two issues are raised in this appeal: (1) Whether Judge Canel’s original order of dismissal operated as res judicata upon the complaint at bar; and (2) Whether the complaint was barred by the Statute of Limitations. It must be emphasized that these two issues are separate and distinct and that different statutes, Supreme Court Rules and case law pertain to each respectively. To illustrate, although Supreme Court Rule 273 is tire focal point for determining tire res judicata issue, it has no bearing on the Statute of Limitations issue. Similarly, the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Roth v. Northern Assurance Co. Ltd.Illinois Supreme Court · 1964
- Tidwell v. SmithAppellate Court of Illinois · 1965
- Ray v. BokorneyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1971
- Casillas v. RosengrenAppellate Court of Illinois · 1967
- In Re Estate of CraneAppellate Court of Illinois · 1951
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.