Legal Opinion

Caromono v. Garman, (Klaus)

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 20, 1941No. Appeal, 103PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Kenworthey, J.,

Appellant, the additional defendant, in this trespass action, was properly served with a Writ of Sci. Fa. on March 13, 1939. After two trials, at neither of which he appeared, and more than a month after final judgments, he, on March 2, 1940, filed a petition to open the judgments and for a new trial on the grounds that (1) plaintiff had failed to comply with the rule of court requiring service of a copy of the order placing the case on the trial list for the second trial, 1 and (2) that the second trial, without his waiver, was held without a jury. 2 The lower court,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Scott v. McEwingSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
  2. Schwan v. KellySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1896
  3. Commonwealth v. J. & A. Moeschlin, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
  4. Planters Nut & Chocolate Co. v. Brown-Murray Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
  5. Raisig v. GrafSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1901

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Curran v. James Regulator Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1943

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API