Legal Opinion

Halsey v. . Snell

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided September 28, 1938PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSeawell, J.

We have set out in some detail the portions of the evidence relating to the two exceptions we think it proper to consider.

■ (a) An aggrieved party may recover for the breach of a contract, made upon sufficient consideration, that the promisor will make him the beneficiary of a bequest or devise in his will, but such a contract must be established by the mode of proof legally permissible in establishing other contracts.

In the case at bar the defendant introduced, in rebuttal, evidence tending to show that the financial worth of deceased at the time of the alleged contract was little more than…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Cape Fear Steamboat Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1870
  2. Jackson v. Commissioners of Greene CountySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1877
  3. Bowman v. Fidelity Trust & Development Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1915
  4. Taylor v. . MeadowsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1921

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. McCraw v. LlewellynSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
  2. Neal v. Wachovia Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1944

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API