Legal Opinion

State v. Phinney

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided August 10, 1990No. 89-759PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHastings, C.J.

In State v. Phinney, 235 Neb. 486, 455 N.W.2d 795 (1990), because this court found that the record furnished on appeal failed to provide an adequate basis for a meaningful review by the court under Neb. Rev. Stat. § 43-276 (Reissue 1988), we remanded the cause with directions to the district court to review the record made on the motion to transfer and to set forth its findings as required by law. We further directed the district court to certify those findings back to this court for further consideration of defendant’s appeal.

Suffice it to say that defendant was originally charged with the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State ex rel. C. A. H.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1982
  2. State v. NevelsNebraska Supreme Court · 1990
  3. State v. AlexanderNebraska Supreme Court · 1983
  4. State v. ThieszenNebraska Supreme Court · 1989
  5. State v. PhinneyNebraska Supreme Court · 1990

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. MantichNebraska Supreme Court · 1996
  2. State v. NielsenNebraska Supreme Court · 1993
  3. State v. GarzaNebraska Supreme Court · 1992
  4. State v. DoyleNebraska Supreme Court · 1991
  5. State v. DoyleNebraska Supreme Court · 1991

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API