Legal Opinion

Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion

Texas Attorney General Reports

Decided July 2, 1992No. DM-170Published

1Opinion of the Court

@ffice of tly ~ttornep @merat &ate of Qexae DAN MORALES September 24,1992 4TTORSEY GEXERAL Clinton M. DeWolfe, O.D. Opinion No. DM-170 Chairman Texas Optometry Board Re: Construction of V.T.C.S. article 9101 Bumet Road, Suite 214 45525.11 of the Texas Optometry Act, Austin, Texas 78758 and related questions (RQ-396) Dear Dr. DeWolfe: You have asked us to construe V.T.C.S. article 4552-5.11(a) and (b) of the Texas Optometry Act (the act), V.T.C.S. article 4552-1.01 et seq., chapter 10. As background material, you provide a hypothetical set of facts. You state that the hypothetical facts are…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Williamson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1898
  2. Orlikowski v. StrashAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API