Legal Opinion

Williamson v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided March 16, 1898No. 1630PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Ho statement necessary.

1Opinion of the Court

DAVIDS OS", Judge.

Appellant was convicted of burglary, and appeals.

The indictment is in the usual form, and contains two counts. The first charges a burglary at night, and the second in the daytime. There are several questions presented by the record, but, under the view we take of the case, it is not necessary to discuss any of them, except the insufficiency of the testimony to support the judgment of conviction. The testimonj'- is very brief, and shows without contradiction that the “house” alleged to have been burglarized was described as follows: “What is commonly known as a ‘header box’…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Willis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1894
  2. Bigham v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1892

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. EbelMontana Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Clark v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1909
  3. Loftis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1952
  4. Stoddard v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1932
  5. Opinion No., Texas Attorney General Reports1992

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API