Legal Opinion

Bartell v. Lohiser

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided June 7, 2000No. 98-1877PublishedCited by 130 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

NATHANIEL R. JONES, Circuit Judge.

Plaintiff-Appellant Ella Bartell brought the instant action against Defendants-Ap-pellees Michigan Family Independence Agency (“FIA”), Lutheran Social Services of Michigan (“LSS”), and others, asserting that they violated various federal and state laws in terminating her parental rights to raise her son. The district court ultimately granted Defendants’ motions for summary judgment, holding that they were shielded from liability by the doctrine of qualified immunity. Bartell now appeals these rulings, and for the reasons that follow, we AFFIRM the…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. City of Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Santosky v. KramerSupreme Court of the United States · 1982

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by130 opinions

  1. Everson v. LeisCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2009
  2. Harrison v. AshCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
  3. Pittman v. Cuyahoga County Department of Children & Family ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2011
  4. Natasha Thomas Susan Gibbs and Edwina Lewis v. Ann Cohen Glenn Craig James Embry and Susan Fischer, in Their Individual CapacitiesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2002
  5. Joseph Siefert v. Hamilton Cty. Bd. of Comm'rsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2020

125 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API