Whitfield v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Smith, Judge.
We reverse the appellants’ burglary convictions because, at their joint trial, the court failed to comply with the jury’s request for a recharge on a legal issue and because the court abused its discretion in failing to require an unsequestered witness to testify prior to the state’s other witnesses.
1. At about 2:05 p.m., while the jury was deliberating, the foreman told a bailiff that he wanted to ask the judge a question of law. At 2:10 p.m., while the trial judge was conducting voir dire on another case, a bailiff informed him that the jury had a question on an issue of law.…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Jarrell v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1975
- Poultryland Inc. v. AndersonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1946
- Edwards v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1975
- Massey v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1965
- Stuart v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1971
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Lingerfelt v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1978
- Martin v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1979
- Chancellor v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1983
- Hall v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1979
- Harrell v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1982
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.