State v. Tierney
Hawaii Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion of the Court by
ACOBA, J.
We hold that when a court orders an examination to determine whether a defendant is fit to proceed to trial pursuant to Hawaii Revised Statutes (HRS) § 704-404(1), and the defendant refuses to cooperate with the examiner, the examiner must produce a report of the examination that expressly states whether “such unwillingness of the defendant was the result of physical or mental disease, disorder, or defect,” if possible. HRS § 704-404(5). If it is not possible for the examiner to make that determination, the examiner must expressly state in the report that it is…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Sibron v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Spencer v. KemnaSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Dusky v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Drope v. MissouriSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Indiana v. EdwardsSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. Pali.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2013
- State v. Metcalfe.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2013
- Chun v. City and County of HonoluluDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 2020
- State v. TierneyHawaii Supreme Court · 2012