Legal Opinion

State v. Tierney

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided May 7, 2012No. SCWC-29939PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

ACOBA, J.

We hold that when a court orders an examination to determine whether a defendant is fit to proceed to trial pursuant to Hawaii Revised Statutes (HRS) § 704-404(1), and the defendant refuses to cooperate with the examiner, the examiner must produce a report of the examination that expressly states whether “such unwillingness of the defendant was the result of physical or mental disease, disorder, or defect,” if possible. HRS § 704-404(5). If it is not possible for the examiner to make that determination, the examiner must expressly state in the report that it is…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Sibron v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Spencer v. KemnaSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  3. Dusky v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  4. Drope v. MissouriSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  5. Indiana v. EdwardsSupreme Court of the United States · 2008

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. Pali.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2013
  2. State v. Metcalfe.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2013
  3. Chun v. City and County of HonoluluDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 2020
  4. State v. TierneyHawaii Supreme Court · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API