Legal Opinion

Clark v. Kraft

Washington Supreme Court

Decided July 19, 1933No. 24007. En BancPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtBeals, C. J.

This controversy involves the foreclosure of a chattel mortgage, two phases of the case having already been determined by this court. State ex rel. Clark v. Superior Court, 167 Wash. 481, 10 P. (2d) 233, and Clark v. Kraft, 169 Wash. 49, 13 P. (2d) 7.

L. H. Kraft, holding the promissory note of plaintiff, Dora H. Clark, secured by a chattel mortgage, sought foreclosure of the mortgage by notice and sale as provided by Rem. Rev. Stat., § 1104 et seq., causing the sheriff of King county to proceed in accordance with that statute. Mrs. Clark then filed her complaint in the superior court, making…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Clark v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Clark v. KraftWashington Supreme Court · 1932

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Remer v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API