Simoni v. Napoli
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
The motion court providently exercised its discretion in denying defendants’ request for a stay of the legal malpractice action pending resolution of plaintiff’s personal injury action (see CPLR 2201). The proceedings do not share complete identity of *488parties, claims and relief sought (see 952 Assoc., LLC v Palmer, 52 AD3d 236 [1st Dept 2008]; Esposit v Anderson Kill Olick & Oshinsky, 237 AD2d 246 [2d Dept 1997]).
The motion court also properly permitted plaintiff to amend the complaint (see CPLR 3025 [b]). The amended complaint and the documents submitted in support of the cross motion allege…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Garnett v. Fox, Horan & Camerini, LLPAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- 952 Associates, LLC v. PalmerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- Esposit v. Anderson Kill Olick & Oshinsky, P. C.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997