Legal Opinion

Garnett v. Fox, Horan & Camerini, LLP

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 3, 2011PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Plaintiffs appeal from the first order, which decided a motion addressed to the sufficiency of the original complaint, was rendered academic by her timely amendment of the complaint (see Langer v Garay, 30 AD2d 942 [1968]).

The amended complaint alleges that defendant was negligent in failing to advise Boylan International properly, that defendant’s negligence caused Boylan’s loss, and that Boylan sustained actual damages (see Reibman v Senie, 302 AD2d 290 [2003]). Specifically, it alleges, inter alia, that defendant failed to mount a defense to Boylan’s tax assessment arrears based on…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Weil, Gotshal & Manges, LLP v. Fashion Boutique of Short Hills, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
  2. Bernstein v. Oppenheim & Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
  3. InKine Pharmaceutical Co. v. ColemanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
  4. Reibman v. SenieAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
  5. LaBrake v. EnzienAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Parent v. New YorkDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2011
  2. Lusk v. WeinsteinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
  3. Cohen v. KachrooAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
  4. In Re Boylan International, Ltd.United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 2011
  5. Angeles v. AronskyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API