Legal Opinion

Hofer v. Hodge

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided January 15, 1884PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Error to Houghton. (Williams, J.) Case. Defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtChamplin, J.

The plaintiff brought an action against the defendant to recover the value of a horse, harness and damages to a wagon, under the following circumstances r On the 26th day of September, 1882, and for some time prior thereto, the defendant was the owner of and operated *373a foundry and machine shop situated on the shore of Portage lake in the county of Iionghton. Plaintiff was under a contract with defendant to do certain team work for him ■at his foundry, in the execution of which he employed his horse, harness and wagon. He also furnished a teamster to drive the horse. This contract to do…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Godfrey v. City of FlintMichigan Supreme Court · 1938
  2. Fraam v. Grand Rapids & Indiana Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1910
  3. Berry v. Cadillac Storage Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1932
  4. Pesola v. ForstenMichigan Supreme Court · 1914
  5. Van Gilder v. City of MorgantownWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1949

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API