Legal Opinion

Pesola v. Forsten

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 25, 1914No. Docket No. 87Published

Error to Chippewa; Hudson, J. Case by Matt Pesóla against Victor Forsten for negligent injuries to plaintiff’s mare. Judgment for plaintiff. Defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtBird, J.

Plaintiff sued and- recovered a judgment against the defendant in an action on the case for the loss of a mare which died while being used by defendant in his lumber camp near Trout Lake. It was the claim of plaintiff that the mare died as the result of cruel and brutal treatment inflicted by the servants of defendant. The defense contended that ,she died from natural causes. When plaintiff’s counsel had *96concluded his opening statement to the jury, defendant requested a directed verdict on the ground that neither the declaration nor the opening statement of counsel stated a cause of action.…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Hofer v. HodgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1884

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API