Legal Opinion

Frank v. DaimlerChrysler Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 28, 2002PublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Nardelli, J.P.

In this appeal, we are asked to determine whether the Supreme Court properly dismissed, for failure to state a cause of action, plaintiffs’ proposed class action, which is based upon a purported defect in the front seat backrests of certain vehicles.

Plaintiffs commenced this proposed class action in June 1999 on behalf of themselves and all New York residents who own a “Class Vehicle,” which includes various specified automobiles manufactured by defendants Ford Motor Company (Ford), General Motors Corporation (General Motors), and Saturn Corporation…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Leon v. MartinezNew York Court of Appeals · 1994
  2. Oswego Laborers' Local 214 Pension Fund v. Marine Midland Bank, N. A.New York Court of Appeals · 1995
  3. Voss v. Black & Decker Manufacturing Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1983
  4. Channel Master Corp. v. Aluminium Limited Sales, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1958
  5. Small v. Lorillard Tobacco Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1999

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. Lloyd v. General Motors Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2007
  2. Tietsworth v. Harley-Davidson, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Sheila C. v. PovichAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
  4. Stearns v. Select Comfort Retail Corp.District Court, N.D. California · 2010
  5. In re General Motors LLC Ignition Switch LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2017

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API