State v. Crowe
Supreme Court of Arkansas
Appeal from Sebastian Circuit Court; Paul Little, Judge; 1. The act was legally passed. It was enrolled, signed by tbe President of the Senate, the Speaker of the House, approved by the Governor and filed with the Secretary of State. 34 Ark. 283; 110 Id. 273. 2. The act does not violate section 2, article 2, Constitution of Arkansas. 58 Ark. 414. It does not deprive the employer of any constitutional right.
Read the full summary
Appeal from Sebastian Circuit Court; Paul Little, Judge; 1. The act was legally passed. It was enrolled, signed by tbe President of the Senate, the Speaker of the House, approved by the Governor and filed with the Secretary of State. 34 Ark. 283; 110 Id. 273. 2. The act does not violate section 2, article 2, Constitution of Arkansas. 58 Ark. 414. It does not deprive the employer of any constitutional right. Under the police power of the State, the act is valid. 58 Ark. 414; 94 U. S.. 113; 143 Id. 517; 125 Id. 680; 49 Ark. 325; 3 Ala. (N. S.) 140; 110 U. S. 347; 68 Ala. 58; 76 Id. 60; 200 U.…
1Opinion of the CourtHart, J.
There is drawn in controversy in this case the validity of Act No. 191 of the General Assembly of 1915 (page 781) entitled, “An Act to regulate the hours of labor, safeguard the health and establish a minimum wage for females in the State of Arkansas.”
The controversy arises only as to the validity of that part of the statute which relates to the fixing of minimum wages. It is contended, in the first place, that the statute was not legally enacted in that when the final vote was taken in the Senate the ayes and nays were not recorded on the journal, as required by section 21, article 5, of the…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Muller v. OregonSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Otis v. ParkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
- People v. . Charles Schweinler PressNew York Court of Appeals · 1915
- Riley v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Stettler v. O'HaraOregon Supreme Court · 1914
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Associated Industries of Oklahoma v. Industrial Welfare CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
- Williams v. EvansSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1917
- Holcombe v. CreamerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1918
- Carlton v. GrimesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1946
- Vissering Mercantile Co. v. AnnunzioIllinois Supreme Court · 1953
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.